Does the end justify the means essay

Does the end justify the means essay

Does the End Justify the Means,Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan

WebWhen considering the notion that “the end justifies the means,” this does not only have to imply that “the means” must inherently be immoral; quite the opposite can be true. An WebIn general, the phrase “The end justifies the means” means an act of doing bad or wicked things in order to achieve a goal. Technically speaking, this is when someone wants to WebThe end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse distasteful and objectionable actions undertaken by its WebDoes the End Justify the Means. Lesley Rawlins The end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse WebNov 18,  · End Justify Means At the beginning of an action we might not know whether the action is morally correct or wrong but when morally right goal is successfully ... read more

The philosophical and moral dilemma of finding the right way of doing things has been relevant throughout time. Often, it is a matter of personal choice and sometimes whole societies have a certain unique method in organizing their plan of action. But is it morally correct to sacrifice the said morals for reaching a goal? Who sets up the criteria that allows for the usage of unacceptable and sometimes impermissible deeds? Niccolo Machiavelli acknowledges that sometimes immoral ways are acceptable and permissible. Machiavelli shares his opinion on the way the government should behave and agrees that sometimes it should act harshly and in an oppressive manner for the law and order to be upheld.

This is a contradiction to the authority and righteousness of the government. How can the leaders of the country who create laws and judge others by these laws, break the laws, so that the laws are obeyed? This makes no logical sense. The fact that some people can use this form of logic is unacceptable but when the government decides that freedom of a person requires the sacrifice of some freedoms, the world becomes chaotic and senseless. In reality, if unworthy means are used to achieve worthy ends, the ends will never be worthy. It is physically and morally impossible to become good and just by stealing, lying and killing. Someone who is morally good will never use unjust means to reach their purpose.

But at the same time there are situations that might question this way of thinking. For example, if a group of criminals terrorize a town and always manage to evade the authorities, would it be correct for the police to invade the privacy of the whole town and listen in on the phone conversations? Or if the criminals are getting away, would it be right to commandeer a car from someone who is going to work and chase after the criminals? Even though the person whose car has been taken might feel that it is immoral, it is done for the greater good. When comparing the crimes that might be committed and the fact that the person will be late for work, it is clear that the lateness is not as important. Ends justifying the means are important ethical dilemmas in moral discourses.

Be that as it may, there are three unique things to consider in such a circumstance: the morality of the ends, the decency of the means, and the morality of the person involved in the process. In this circumstance, the means killing is obviously unethical and so is the killer. But the end is an enjoyable task that is sparing the world. Is it a good thing that is allowing the killers to kill anybody when they need and then just justifying the means? Ethics, which is a vital facet of human research, is a practice as well as discipline.

Doing the clinical research, it is very important to ethically justify the criteria for the research design, conduction of experiment, and reviewing the clinical investigation. All must be identified by the requirements and obligations of both the researcher and the human subject. In medical ethics, there is a major difference between two fundamental moral positions: deontology and consequentialism. Most of the people believe that there are specific activities which are intrinsically terrible, things like killing someone, plague, robbery, and so on. Some proponents of deontology, similar to Kant, have a firm believe that stealing something, for instance, is always awful.

In other words, one cannot justify these actions. For consequentialists, the ends always do justify the means. The moral convictions and beliefs of majority of individuals fall into the mixture of both philosophies. A third one the utilitarian approach, according to this approach decisions and choices are made based upon the greatest good that is obtained for greatest number of people. This is quite close to consequentialist approach, since this is too based upon the proposition that actions determine the morality of some intervention. According to this approach, if the results is advantageous for a vast number of people then it is ok to harm few individuals.

This approach is normally guided by the computed advantages or damages for an action based upon the empirical evidence. A few of cases based upon utilitarian approach in the clinical setting include using artificial respiration for premature babies or treatment the acid or fire burns victims based upon the availability of time. Although a wide range of people goes with this approach but for me the only thing which is right in its original essence is the right way to evaluate it. As in the case of given scenario, I will prefer to find another way rather using a drug that been made by killing innocent homeless people. For me choosing the right path and live in peace is far better than preferring the decision where the means needed to be justified by the end.

Nobody can apply awful means to any remarkable and high end. It is just like a person who is constructing an extraordinary house by using terrible material — it is not an appropriate way. What we neglect to find in this announcement is merely the end. We all deny to see and precisely look at the means and how they influence the conclusions. Is it possible that whatever the end is we keep on ignoring the process? There are a significant measure of troubles and confusions when pitiful means are utilized to achieve admirable means. History has been filled with many examples that have focused on the experiments on humans.

Although proper guidelines are available for using humans in clinical trials. Although some clinical trials have resulted in the successful invention of medicines, yet there are many flop experiment that has been resulted in the deaths of subjects. For example, In , Freund almost executed his subject under study while exploring different avenues regarding X-beams to evacuate hair on moles. In , Fletcher employed the detainees of a crazy shelter to consider beriberi. Some forty-three patients gotten the illness, and eighteen expired. The investigation is viewed as critical and is frequently referred to, yet nobody has said on the moral issues that were made. In a progression of analyses was performed on twelve common administration representatives to decide the impacts of nourishment additives.

Positively the evilest however among the most useless investigations of all were those led by Nazi doctors on regular Jewish folks, detainees of war and others entombed in inhumane imprisonments. All these deaths of innocent people do not justify the means. Similarly, In Guatemala, during the time period of to scientists of USA infested many people with a mental health condition with sexually transferred disease STD. The scientists infused the patients with syphilis and gonorrhea —and insisted a significant number of patients to pass the illness on to others by having sexual relationships.

The examinations were then, done in collaboration with the Guatemalan government. After that these trials were completed by PHS under the fabrication of syphilis vaccinations. Retrieved September 16, , from www. Macy's Marketing Strategy, Creative Essay Example. Issues Behind Thimerosal Controversy, Essay Example. Need a professionally written Custom Essay? Right now, you can get a professionally written essay in any discipline with a. We're now sending you a link to download your e-book, please check your e-mail. Thank you! You can receive the notifications now. It's pleasure to stay in touch! Show all. Paper Types Movie Review Essay Admission Essay Annotated Bibliography Application Essay Article Critique Article Review Article Writing Assessment Book Review Business Plan Business Proposal Capstone Project Case Study Coursework Cover Letter Creative Essay Dissertation Dissertation - Abstract Dissertation - Conclusion Dissertation - Discussion Dissertation - Hypothesis Dissertation - Introduction Dissertation - Literature Dissertation - Methodology Dissertation - Results GCSE Coursework Grant Proposal Interview Lab Report Marketing Plan Multiple Choice Quiz Quiz Personal Statement Poem Power Point Presentation Power Point Presentation With Speaker Notes Questionnaire Reaction Paper Research Paper Research Proposal Speech SWOT analysis Term Paper Thesis Paper Online Quiz Resume Outline Literature Review Movie Analysis Statistics problem Math Problem Article.

Get a Free E-Book! Essay Example. Does the End Justify the Means? Pages: 3 Words: Essay. This Essay was written by one of our professional writers. Need a custom Essay written for you? HIRE A WRITER! References Machiavelli, N. Stuck with your Essay?

Our website uses cookies to offer you the most relevant experience and optimal performance. Cookie Policies. Activate JavaScript to see the phone number. It implies that any method, however foul, cruel or illegal, used to achieve the targeted result is justifiable. Besides, the statement has elicited a multiplicity of reactions among people across the globe. Thus, some consider it to be correct while others strongly oppose it. Basically, the phrase is customarily used to underscore the principles and ethics of deeds. A deed itself might be disgraceful, but as the only key to achieving a target, it could be tolerable.

This concept is mostly used by people who want to justify their choices by relativism, as a way to clear their conscience from their doings. Proponents of this statement in some cases use it as an excuse to wreak havoc and cause mayhem. In their opinion, it is fair to use deception and fraud as an implement of war. Those who are passionately convicted about their course often stop at nothing when obtaining results, which to them is the only plausible outcome. A number of individuals, in contrary, admit that there is no justification for any punitive measures taken in pursuit of achieving a goal. Machiavelli, however, was a strong believer in the importance of prosperity in all fronts — himself, his subjects and his state as a whole, and nothing would come before all that. His views depict his vehement intentions for doing anything that would lead to the fruition of any desired end.

In a smaller way, the end may be our success and satisfaction, and our contemporaries. For a leader, the means remain critical for legacy and reputation while the end is what really matters to the public. To maintain the power and preserve legitimacy, therefore, a leader should guarantee the gratification of the people. This is the basis of the election and re-election of some leaders — what they have achieved for the people or what they vouchsafe to for the electorate. People do several things with the greater good in consideration. Machiavelli, in his turn, argues that humans are naturally indecisive, capricious, and selfish. The outcome is more important than the steps taken to achieve it.

The end does not justify the means. The means by which one endeavors to realize the ends are similarly as significant as the end itself. The methods used should be as honorable as the outcome. It is apparent that many leaders and people have failed to internalize this phrase. From their unfortunate viewpoint, it is insane to worry about what is right. The truth is, however, that this phrase is a summary of one of the chief principles of morality. For instance, one cannot attain justice if they fail to abide by the ideals of justice. These principles should never be overlooked or obliterated since doing so cohesion and harmonious co-existence of humans is in danger.

Fundamental ethics are not meant to cause any harm to individuals. We live in free world, and nobody has the freedom and right to impose their will on others. It is also a public obligation to be fair and just and to defend what is right despite the situation. In the absence of morals in the society, people would live in endless anxiety. It is ethically unacceptable to use any necessary means. This is a principle that should forever be upheld by leaders. However, many leaders would presumably act in a manner advantageous to the people, but it should be known that these leaders have no absolute rights to make decisions for their constituents.

In fact, those decisions made and actions taken by leaders have a great impact on the people. It is therefore of paramount importance that leaders remain ethical in their endeavors to protect the interests of their subjects. The argument is based on giving examples of the actions of leaders including Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi, and Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan. The United Arab Emirates federation was formed on the second day of December Following its formation, His Highness Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan al Nahyan, the ruler of the Abu Dhabi emirate, served the emerging country as its president. It is difficult to comprehend the foundation and organization of the UAE without the input of Sheikh Zayed in the picture.

His strongly held principles based on the religion of Islam, diligence and willpower propelled him towards building a prosperous nation from an underdeveloped one Wilson, Sheikh Zayed was known for his big-heartedness both locally and internationally, and for his manner in which he dedicated his life to serving people and his sole desire to create a better world. The actual date of birth of Sheikh Zayed is not clearly known. It is, however, recorded that he was born sometime in to His Highness Sheikh Sultan bin Zayed al Nahyan whose reign as the ruler of the Abu Dhabi emirate ran from to He was the youngest of his four brothers. As a young man, Sheikh Zayed traveled far and wide across his country and gained a profound understanding of the land and its inhabitants.

When petroleum companies permeated the country to prospect for oil, he was assigned as a chaperone. As a result, he thus gained a firsthand exposure to the trade that would later revolutionize the development of his country. Admittedly, his insatiable hunger for knowledge led him to the desert together with the Bedouin tribesmen. In his new assignment, he embraced the consensus and open discussion, and his decisions were renowned for their astuteness, deep insight, and fairness. With the dismal revenue, Sheikh Zayed successfully advanced Al Ain. He organized a simple system of administration and facilitated the establishment of the first contemporary school in Abu Dhabi while encouraging those close to him to make contributions towards the local development schemes.

The Sheikh reviewed the local rights to water ownership and made sure that the distribution was more reasonable and just than before Wilson, Thus, this step has fast-tracked the development of agriculture and the center at large. In August , Sheikh Zayed became the Ruler of Abu Dhabi with an ambition to hasten the improvement of the region. With the increasing oil revenues, he began the establishment of schools, hospitals, and proper housing in addition to road construction. The experience he had gained in Al Ain made him a proficient and visionary administrator. Moreover, the British who had initially been protecting the Trucial States announced their withdrawal from the area in Sheikh Zayed promptly actively started to build closer links with the other Emirates.

He publically demanded the formation of a Federation that would be inclusive of the seven emirates that initially constituted the Trucial States together with Bahrain and Qatar National Archives, n. In due course, the seven Trucial states joined Sheikh Zayed in creating the UAE, which officially appeared on the international arena in December The UAE emerged during a period that was marred with a political tumult in the region. Iran had got under control the islands of Tunb, a portion of Ras al-Khaimah, and had deployed troops to Abu Musa in Sharjah. Owing to the prevailing border disputes and major disparity among the seven emirates, projections made by foreign analysts pointed to the troubled survival of the UAE.

Sheikh Zayed kept a positive mind and prove the predictions of those cynics to be merely speculative UAEInteract, n. It is without a doubt evident that the peace, success, and growth that is patent to the UAE today is as a result of the focus and foundational role that was played by Sheikh Zayed. His gusto and fervor were crucial in propelling the UAE toward current prosperity and self-sustenance. Sheikh Zayed became a darling man to his people and his fellow rulers. The manner in which he sought pacification and consensus won him a tremendous support. He was elected as the first president of the UAE. His proven track record saw him re-elected to the seat, a capacity in which he served until his demise.

In other words, he was a passionate proponent of justice and equality. His reign was characterized by the empowerment of women as he championed for the provision of education and employment opportunities to males and females alike. Traditionally, the principle had been enacted through the councils known as Majlis. This was a form of what is currently referred to as a direct democracy. With the country developing rapidly, it was necessary to formalize the process of consultation. The Federal National Council was therefore instituted by the Constitution of the UAE to bring the leaders of all the ethnic groups together. Sheikh Zayed was an outstandingly strong adversary of punitive dogmas and bigotry. He openly condemned the acts of terror against humans and proclaimed that Islam was a religion of compassion and forbearance.

The leader practiced his ideals of tolerance more extensively. The UAE was famed for enhancing harmony, mutual aid, and cooperation in the Arab world UAEinteract, n. Sheikh Zayed inculcated a culture of peaceful conflict resolution through dialogue and finding a suitable middle ground for all the involved factions while averting any options that would involve the use of force. Sheikh Zayed identified the potential that the UAE had in taking part in international pacification processes. He commissioned the UAE defense forces to participate in the Arab Deterrent Force whose aim was to bring the civil discord and strife in Lebanon to the end.

In , Sheikh Zayed expressed his support for the resolution by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO to initiate its above ground operation to compel Serbia to stop its inhuman and unethical activities of genocide against Kosovo. Through organizations established by Sheikh Zayed, the UAE appears at the center of providing relief and developmental across the globe Embassy of the United Arab Emirates, Upon his death in , Sheikh Zayed left a legacy as the Father of the UAE. However, the principles and values that he introduced to the government remain central to the state and its policies till now.

The former South African president and activist Nelson Mandela contributed immensely to the annihilation of the apartheid rule and was globally known for being an activist of human freedoms and rights. He led both non-violent and forceful crusades against the despotic regime by the whites in a racially striated South Africa during his time as a member of the African National Congress party ANC. Because of his engagements he was imprisoned for twenty-seven years and became the symbol of the antiapartheid drive both in his country and in the world. He was released in and continued to press for a racially liberal South Africa. Nelson Mandela formed a government would guarantee the peaceful transition of the country from an oppressive apartheid rule History, n.

Even after unassuming his political roles, Mandela stayed devoted to his advocacy for justice and harmony in South Africa and across the world until he died in The party introduced apartheid, a system that barred non-whites from enjoying fundamental rights and freedoms not to mention participation in the government. The ANC developed and adopted a strategy to guarantee citizenship for all the South African people through non-violent boycotts and strikes.

​Do the “Ends Justify the Means?” Essay,Introduction

WebDoes the End Justify the Means. Lesley Rawlins The end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse WebNov 18,  · End Justify Means At the beginning of an action we might not know whether the action is morally correct or wrong but when morally right goal is successfully WebWhen considering the notion that “the end justifies the means,” this does not only have to imply that “the means” must inherently be immoral; quite the opposite can be true. An WebIn general, the phrase “The end justifies the means” means an act of doing bad or wicked things in order to achieve a goal. Technically speaking, this is when someone wants to WebSep 24,  · Does the end ever justify the means? The response to this inquiry relies upon what the outcomes or objectives are and what implies are being utilized to WebThe end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse distasteful and objectionable actions undertaken by its ... read more

The end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse distasteful and objectionable actions undertaken by its people. Scores were apprehended, and Indian prisons became overpopulated with supporters of independence. The answer is much more complex than a simple yes or no. The means by which one endeavors to realize the ends are similarly as significant as the end itself. Your time is important. Personality Characteristics Of Guards And Prisoners Words 4 Pages.

He founded does the end justify the means essay organizations aimed at addressing and alleviating human problems. Don't waste your time on boring tasks! Buy Essay Homework Help Essay Editing Pay For Essay Write My College Essay Thesis Help Do My Essay Assignment Help Write My Essay Essay Writing Help Buy Term Paper Coursework Writing Write My Research Paper. A radical faction became separated to found the Pan Africanist Congress PAC. Good Essays.